This form contains a series of questions that need to be answered. As you go about answering the questions, please keep the following things in mind:While it is not required that each question be answered at this time, all questions must have answers before the response is submitted to The Open Group for review and publication.Press the "Save" button at any time to save work in progress. Once the work has been saved, there is the option to continue editing if required.Many questions have instructions to assist in development of answers. They are marked with the indicator. Please look at the instructions carefully.Although HTML markup can be included in answers, this is not recommended apart from basic tags such as <p> and <br>, since incorrect markup could effect the format of other items in the document.Questions on this system should be addressed to the Conformance Statement manager at The Open Group.
Enter the name of the Organization that produced the implementation and the name of the author of the Conformance Statement.
A product may be registered in all members of a binary-compatible family of products on the basis of a single test report.
Answer the questions for each binary-compatible family. Alternately, provide the answers in the Appendix at the end of this document.
Question 1: Which of the following Feature Groups are supported by the implementation?
Response
The POSIX.2 C-language Binding Feature Group is mandatory when associated with an implementation that conforms to Issue 4 or later of the CAE Specification for Commands and Utilities. Otherwise it is optional.
All the interfaces in all feature groups must exist, whether or not the feature group is supported, and each interface must either behave according to the description in System Interfaces and Headers, Issue 4, Version 2, or indicate an error, with errno set to [ENOSYS].
Support for a Feature Group can only be claimed if all interfaces in that group behave according to the relevant descriptions in System Interfaces and Headers, Issue 4, Version 2.
Rationale
System Interfaces and Headers, Issue 4, Version 2 states that the system may provide one or more of the Feature Groups listed. It further states (on page 855) that support for certain feature groups (e.g., POSIX2 C-language Binding) is mandatory when associated with an implementation that conforms to Issue 4 or later of the CAE Specification for Commands and Utilities; that is, when the value of _XOPEN_XCU_VERSION is greater that or equal to 4.
Reference
CAE Specification, System Interfaces and Headers, Issue 4, Version 2, Section 1.2, Conformance, Section 1.3, Feature Groups and Chapter 4, Headers, <unistd.h>.
Question 2: Which of the following options, specified in the <unistd.h> header file, are available on the system?
Where indicated in the following table, select one of the options given (either "Yes" or "Variable"). Select "Variable" if there are system dependent or file_system dependent configuration procedures that can remove or modify any or all of these features.
For a conformant implementation, all of these POSIX features must be provided. In some cases the feature need not be provided for all files or devices supported by the implementation.
CAE Specification, System Interfaces and Headers, Issue 4, Version 2, Chapter 4, Headers, <unistd.h>.
Question 3: What are the values associated with the following constants specified in the <float.h> header file?
This set of constants provides useful information regarding the underlying architecture of the implementation.
CAE Specification, System Interfaces and Headers, Issue 4, Version 2, Chapter 4, Headers, <float.h>.
Question 4: What are the values associated with the following constants (optionally specified in the <limits.h> header file)?
After each table entry below add the values for your implementation. These values may be stated to be "Unlimited" if your implementation does not impose a limit.
Each of these limits can vary within bounds set by System Interfaces and Headers, Issue 4, Version 2. The minimum permitted value is specified in Chapter 4, <limits.h> of CAE Specification, System Interfaces and Headers, Issue 4, Version 2.
CAE Specification, System Interfaces and Headers, Issue 4, Version 2, Chapter 4, Headers, <limits.h>.
Question 5: What are the values associated with the following constants specified in the <limits.h> header file?
After each table entry in the table below add the values for your implementation. These values may be stated to be "Unlimited" if your implementation does not impose a limit.
Question 6: What are the values associated with the following numerical constants specified in the <limits.h> header file?
Question 7: What are the values associated with the following numerical constants specified in the <stdio.h> header file?
This set of constants provide useful information about the implementation.
CAE Specification, System Interfaces and Headers, Issue 4, Version 2, Chapter 4, Headers, <stdio.h>.
Question 8: Which of the following option errors listed in System Interfaces and Headers, Issue 4, Version 2 are detected in the circumstances specified?
Each of the above error conditions is marked as optional in System Interfaces and Headers, Issue 4, Version 2 and an implementation may return this error in the circumstances specified or may not provide the error indication.
CAE Specification, System Interfaces and Headers, Issue 4, Version 2, Section 2.3, Error Numbers.
Question 9: What format of floating-point numbers is supported by this implementation?
Either use the default answer or provide a description of the floating point format used by your implementation.
Most implementations support IEEE floating point format either in hardware or software. Some implementations support other formats with different exponent and mantissa accuracy. These differences need to be defined.
CAE Specification, System Interfaces and Headers, Issue 4, Version 2, Section 1.6, Relationship to Formal Standards.
Question 10: Are the optional data encryption interfaces provided?
Mark each of the following table entries appropriately. If your implementation is effected by any export restrictions imposed by the US Government, indicate these restrictions in the following area.
Export Restrictions:
Normally, an implementation will either provide all three of these routines or will provide none of them at all. If the routines are not provided, then the implementation must provide a dummy interface which always raises an ENOSYS error condition.
It is also possible that the implementation of the encrypt() function may be affected by export restrictions, in which case, the restrictions should be documented here.
For example, historical implementations have supplied all three of these routines outside the U.S.A., but due to export restrictions on the decoding algorithm, a dummy version of encrypt() is provided that does encoding but no decoding.
CAE Specification, System Interfaces and Headers, Issue 4, Version 2, Section 1.2, Conformance.
Question 11: Which file types (regular, directory, FIFO, special, and so on) are considered to be executable?
Enter the file types that are executable on your implementation in the area below.
The [EACCES] error associated with exec functions occurs in circumstances when the implementation does not support execution of files of the type specified. A list of these file types needs to be provided.
CAE Specification, System Interfaces and Headers, Issue 4, Version 2, Chapter 3, System Interfaces, exec.
Question 12: What file access control mechanisms does the implementation provide?
Either indicate that "Standard access control is provided.", that the reader should "Refer to the POSIX.1 Conformance Document, Section 2.4", or provide a detailed description of the access control and/or additional or alternate access mechanisms on your implementation.
System Interfaces and Headers, Issue 4, Version 2 notes that implementations may provide additional or alternate file access control mechanisms, or both.
CAE Specification, System Interface Definitions, Issue 4, Version 2, Chapter 2, Glossary, file access permissions.
Question 13: Are any additional or alternate file access control mechanisms implemented that could cause fstat() or stat() to fail?
Yes No
System Interfaces and Headers, Issue 4, Version 2 notes that there could be an interaction between additional and alternate access controls and the success of fstat() and stat(). This would suggest that an implementation can allow access to a file but not allow the process to gain information about the status of the file.
CAE Specification, System Interfaces and Headers, Issue 4, Version 2, Chapter 3, System Interfaces, fstat() and stat().
Question 14: Does the printf() function produce character string representations for Infinity and NaN to represent the respective values?
This behaviour is often provided on systems with mathematical functions that produce these results.
CAE Specification, System Interfaces and Headers, Issue 4, Version 2, Chapter 3, System Interfaces, fprintf().
Question 15: What coded character sets are supported by the implementation?
System Interface Definitions, Issue 4, Version 2 states that conforming implementations support one or more coded character sets, and that each of these includes the portable character set.
CAE Specification, System Interface Definitions, Issue 4, Version 2, Chapter 4, Character Set.
Question 16: What is the implementation's underlying internal codeset?
If the implementation does not use ISO 8859-1:1987, provide the name or description of the underlying codeset.
It is useful to be aware of the underlying codeset of the implementation.
Copyright © All rights reserved.