The following review instructions are typically used (these are based on the X/Open Aardvark bug eater format used for some specification development).
Comments should take the following format, which allows us to collate comments by section. Subject: BUG in Open Group-TS_SPEC_V1.0 @ pageline section objection|comment|editorial [comment] Problem: Explain why here. Be sure to add sufficient explanation for someone not familiar with the problem to be able to make a decision. Action: Be specific, that is give precise editorial instructions for change. For example @ page 344 line 62 section /foo objection Also /foo2 Problem: /foo/dp may not exist if the dp extension is not supported. The LSB spec says clearly that the dp extension is optional. Action: Make this a conditional test, replace the existing text with "If the implementation provides the dp extension then the /foo/dp directory exists and is searchable"